Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and PULS returned +4.2%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, NOBL or PULS?

NOBL charges 0.35% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NOBL vs PULS: how they differ

NOBL and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NOBL returned more over the year.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in NOBL	Only in PULS
Nucor Corp. 1.77%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
International Business Machines Corp. 1.71%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

NOBL and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	ProShares	PGIM
What it is	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+9.4%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−8.1 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.15%
Holdings	69	553

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and PULS returned +4.2%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or PULS?: NOBL charges 0.35% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NOBL against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NOBL against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/NOBL-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources