Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NLR vs VTI

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NLR and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions NLR and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingNLRVTI
Constellation Energy Corp8.03%0.11%
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc7.08%0.06%
BWX Technologies Inc6.77%0.03%
Oklo Inc5.21%0.01%
Uranium Energy Corp4.99%0.01%
Energy Fuels Inc/Canada4.67%0.01%
NuScale Power Corp4.76%0.01%
Centrus Energy Corp5.04%0.00%
Ur-Energy Inc0.76%0.00%
X-Energy Inc2.38%0.00%
NANO Nuclear Energy Inc1.92%0.00%
Encore Energy Corp0.47%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in NLROnly in VTI
Cameco Corp 8.39%NVIDIA Corp 6.37%
Fortum Oyj 5.74%Apple Inc 5.88%
NexGen Energy Ltd 4.96%Microsoft Corp 3.84%
Denison Mines Corp 4.76%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
NAC Kazatomprom JSC 4.37%Alphabet Inc 2.90%
Paladin Energy Ltd 4.35%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
CGN Power Co Ltd 3.90%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
Yellow Cake PLC 2.78%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.

NLR and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsThemes deskCore fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isNuclear and uraniumUS total market
Total return, 1 year+4.0%+20.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−16.0 pts+0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.52%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50015.1%88.3%
Holdings253531

NLR in plain words

By weight, 15% of NLR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested against +20.0% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 16.0 pts. It sits 27.0% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

VTI in plain words

VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NLR or VTI?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NLR returned +4.0% and VTI returned +20.0%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NLR or VTI?
NLR charges 0.52% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NLR and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 15% of NLR and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are NLR and VTI the same kind of fund?
No. NLR is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NLR against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 4, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NLR against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/NLR-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources