Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XOVR?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so MUB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or XOVR?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs XOVR: how they differ

MUB and XOVR hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in XOVR
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	Nvidia Corp 9.48%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	Alphabet Inc 6.53%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	Meta Platforms Inc 4.47%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	Applovin Corp 3.95%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	Natera Inc 3.70%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56%
State of California 0.13%	Veeva Systems Inc 3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MUB and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	ERShares
What it is	National Muni Bond	Private-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	−17.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.75%
Holdings	6603	32

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XOVR?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so MUB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or XOVR?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources