Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or XLV?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs XLV: how they differ

MUB and XLV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLV returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and XLV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in XLV
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	Eli Lilly & Co 16.56%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	Johnson & Johnson 10.67%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	AbbVie Inc 7.76%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	UnitedHealth Group Inc 6.59%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	Merck & Co Inc 5.54%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	Amgen Inc 3.41%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.25%
State of California 0.13%	Abbott Laboratories 2.76%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MUB and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	National Muni Bond	Health care
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	+2.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.08%
Holdings	6603	59

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLV returned +20.4%, so XLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or XLV?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources