Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLG?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or XLG?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs XLG: how they differ

MUB and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLG returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in XLG
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	NVIDIA Corp. 13.10%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	Apple Inc. 10.76%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	Microsoft Corp. 8.18%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	Alphabet Inc. 6.05%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	Broadcom Inc. 4.85%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	Alphabet Inc. 4.82%
State of California 0.13%	Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MUB and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	National Muni Bond	S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	−5.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.20%
Holdings	6603	51

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLG?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or XLG?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources