Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLC?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLC returned −2.0%, so MUB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or XLC?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs XLC: how they differ

MUB and XLC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MUB returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in XLC
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	Meta Platforms Inc 19.93%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	Alphabet Inc 13.10%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	Alphabet Inc 10.44%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	Netflix Inc 4.84%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	Comcast Corp 4.71%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
State of California 0.13%	Electronic Arts Inc 4.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MUB and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	XLC State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	National Muni Bond	Communication services
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	−19.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.08%
Holdings	6603	23

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or XLC?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and XLC returned −2.0%, so MUB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or XLC?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources