Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VGT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or VGT?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs VGT: how they differ

MUB and VGT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in VGT
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	NVIDIA Corp 16.85%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	Apple Inc 14.59%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	Microsoft Corp 9.47%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	Broadcom Inc 4.21%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	Micron Technology Inc 4.21%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	Intel Corp 2.03%
State of California 0.13%	Cisco Systems Inc 1.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

MUB and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	National Muni Bond	Information technology
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+35.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	+17.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.09%
Holdings	6603	317

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VGT in plain words

VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VGT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or VGT?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against VGT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources