Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MUB vs VCSH: how they differ
MUB and VCSH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VCSH returned more over the year.
iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MUB and VCSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MUB | Only in VCSH |
|---|---|
| Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.85% |
| New York State Thruway Authority 0.16% | Bank of America Corp 0.24% |
| New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14% | AbbVie Inc 0.21% |
| Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13% | CVS Health Corp 0.21% |
| Northwest Independent School District 0.13% | T-Mobile USA Inc 0.20% |
| Ohio State University (The) 0.13% | Boeing Co/The 0.20% |
| State of New Jersey 0.13% | Wells Fargo & Co 0.18% |
| State of California 0.13% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.18% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF | VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | National Muni Bond | Short-Term Corporate Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.1% | +1.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.4 pts | −15.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 6603 | 2999 |
MUB in plain words
MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VCSH in plain words
VCSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MUB or VCSH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and VCSH returned +1.6%, so VCSH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MUB or VCSH?
- MUB charges 0.05% a year and VCSH charges 0.03%, so VCSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against VCSH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-VCSH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources