Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SHV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SHV returned +3.6%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or SHV?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs SHV: how they differ

MUB and SHV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SHV returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in SHV
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	United States of America 17.17%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	United States of America 12.38%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	United States of America 9.88%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	United States of America 8.60%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	United States of America 8.55%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	United States of America 8.38%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	United States of America 6.85%
State of California 0.13%	United States of America 6.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

MUB and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	National Muni Bond	0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+3.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	−13.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.15%
Holdings	6603	13

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SHV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SHV returned +3.6%, so SHV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or SHV?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against SHV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against SHV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-SHV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources