Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SCHG?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MUB or SCHG?

MUB charges 0.05% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MUB vs SCHG: how they differ

MUB and SCHG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

iShares National Muni Bond ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MUB and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MUB	Only in SCHG
Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%	NVIDIA Corp 11.02%
New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%	Apple Inc 9.84%
New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%	Microsoft Corp 7.18%
Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%	Amazon.com Inc 5.68%
Northwest Independent School District 0.13%	Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Ohio State University (The) 0.13%	Broadcom Inc 4.55%
State of New Jersey 0.13%	Tesla Inc 3.92%
State of California 0.13%	Alphabet Inc 3.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

MUB and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF	SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	National Muni Bond	U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	+0.1%	+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.4 pts	−4.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.04%
Holdings	6603	193

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MUB or SCHG?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MUB returned +0.1% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MUB or SCHG?: MUB charges 0.05% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MUB against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUB against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MUB-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources