Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MTUM vs XOVR: how they differ
MTUM and XOVR hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and XOVR hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MTUM | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 4.65% | 9.48% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.95% | 6.53% |
| APPLOVIN CORPORATION | 0.87% | 3.95% |
| ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. | 0.82% | 2.31% |
| ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC. | 0.57% | 3.56% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 1.52% | 0.56% |
| MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. | 0.31% | 1.77% |
| ROCKET LAB CORPORATION | 0.12% | 2.50% |
| Astera Labs, Inc | 0.07% | 7.75% |
| NATERA, INC. | 0.04% | 3.70% |
| Only in MTUM | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.57% | Meta Platforms Inc 4.47% |
| BROADCOM INC. 5.41% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.04% | Reddit Inc 2.78% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 3.84% | Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.76% | Axon Enterprise Inc 2.60% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.62% | Mongodb Inc 2.29% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44% | Roku Inc 2.16% |
| CATERPILLAR INC. 3.21% | Tempus Ai Inc 2.06% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | ERShares |
| What it is | MSCI USA Momentum Factor | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.8% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.3 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.2% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 125 | 32 |
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or XOVR?
- MTUM charges 0.15% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MTUM and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 98% of MTUM and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MTUM against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MTUM-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources