Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MTUM vs XLP: how they differ

MTUM and XLP hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and XLP hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MTUM and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMTUMXLP
WALMART INC.2.76%10.84%
MONSTER BEVERAGE CORPORATION0.35%4.47%
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION0.08%1.65%
DOLLAR TREE, INC.0.05%1.43%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MTUMOnly in XLP
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.57%Costco Wholesale Corp 9.06%
BROADCOM INC. 5.41%Procter & Gamble Co/The 7.46%
NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.65%Coca-Cola Co/The 6.87%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.04%Philip Morris International Inc 6.16%
INTEL CORPORATION 3.84%Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.76%Altria Group Inc 4.55%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.62%PepsiCo Inc 4.34%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44%Mondelez International Inc 4.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MTUM and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Momentum FactorConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+21.8%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.3 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50098.2%100.0%
Holdings12534

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and XLP returned +6.3%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or XLP?
MTUM charges 0.15% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MTUM and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of MTUM and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MTUM against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MTUM against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MTUM-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources