Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MTUM vs VLUE: how they differ
MTUM and VLUE hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and VLUE hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MTUM | VLUE |
|---|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.57% | 11.63% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 3.84% | 9.29% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 2.36% | 3.67% |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION | 1.54% | 1.89% |
| CITIGROUP INC. | 1.13% | 1.94% |
| WELLS FARGO & COMPANY | 1.26% | 1.12% |
| NEWMONT CORPORATION | 1.17% | 0.64% |
| GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY | 0.42% | 3.16% |
| FEDEX CORPORATION | 0.36% | 1.69% |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 0.33% | 0.59% |
| TE CONNECTIVITY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY | 0.32% | 0.93% |
| FOX CORPORATION | 0.11% | 0.15% |
| Only in MTUM | Only in VLUE |
|---|---|
| BROADCOM INC. 5.41% | CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 4.97% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.65% | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2.66% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.04% | AT&T INC. 2.53% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.76% | BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.88% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.62% | QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.80% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44% | MERCK & CO., INC. 1.57% |
| CATERPILLAR INC. 3.21% | COMCAST CORPORATION 1.50% |
| ALPHABET INC. 2.95% | FORD MOTOR COMPANY 1.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI USA Momentum Factor | MSCI USA Value Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.8% | +69.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.3 pts | +51.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.2% | 96.9% |
| Holdings | 125 | 148 |
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VLUE in plain words
VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or VLUE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or VLUE?
- MTUM charges 0.15% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MTUM and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 98% of MTUM and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MTUM against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MTUM-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources