Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MTUM vs SPYG: how they differ
MTUM and SPYG hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SPYG hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MTUM | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| BROADCOM INC. | 5.41% | 5.04% |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 4.65% | 13.66% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.57% | 3.67% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.95% | 5.91% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 4.04% | 2.67% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.39% | 4.71% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. | 2.87% | 1.68% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 2.36% | 1.62% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 3.62% | 1.53% |
| CATERPILLAR INC. | 3.21% | 1.38% |
| KLA CORPORATION | 1.61% | 1.11% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 3.76% | 1.02% |
| Only in MTUM | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| INTEL CORPORATION 3.84% | Microsoft Corp 7.81% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44% | Apple Inc 5.99% |
| WALMART INC. 2.76% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.49% |
| WESTERN DIGITAL CORPORATION 1.54% | Amazon.com Inc 3.48% |
| SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMIT 1.51% | Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% |
| WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 1.26% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58% |
| CITIGROUP INC. 1.13% | Tesla Inc 2.07% |
| ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 1.02% | Sandisk Corp 0.95% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI USA Momentum Factor | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.8% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.3 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.2% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 125 | 147 |
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or SPYG?
- MTUM charges 0.15% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MTUM and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 98% of MTUM and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MTUM against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MTUM-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources