Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MTUM vs SCHX: how they differ
MTUM and SCHX hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SCHX hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MTUM | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 4.65% | 7.51% |
| BROADCOM INC. | 5.41% | 3.10% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.95% | 3.24% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.39% | 2.58% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 5.57% | 1.60% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 4.04% | 1.23% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. | 2.87% | 1.18% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION | 3.44% | 0.89% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 3.76% | 0.80% |
| INTEL CORPORATION | 3.84% | 0.79% |
| WALMART INC. | 2.76% | 0.74% |
| CATERPILLAR INC. | 3.21% | 0.60% |
| Only in MTUM | Only in SCHX |
|---|---|
| SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMIT 1.51% | Apple Inc 6.71% |
| LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC. 0.56% | Microsoft Corp 4.89% |
| ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD. 0.54% | Amazon.com Inc 3.87% |
| JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LI 0.50% | Meta Platforms Inc 2.02% |
| TE CONNECTIVITY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.32% | Tesla Inc 1.79% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. 0.12% | Eli Lilly & Co 1.28% |
| Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.12% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.27% |
| HEICO CORPORATION 0.09% | Visa Inc 0.80% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | MSCI USA Momentum Factor | U.S. Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.3 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.2% | 94.9% |
| Holdings | 125 | 748 |
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHX in plain words
SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SCHX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +21.8% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or SCHX?
- MTUM charges 0.15% a year and SCHX charges 0.03%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MTUM and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 98% of MTUM and 95% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MTUM against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MTUM-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources