Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs XLP: how they differ

MOAT and XLP hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and MOAT returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and XLP hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATXLP
Kenvue Inc2.59%2.39%
Mondelez International Inc2.34%4.17%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The2.14%1.27%
Constellation Brands Inc2.32%1.26%
Hershey Co/The1.22%1.69%
PepsiCo Inc1.17%4.34%
McCormick & Co Inc/MD1.29%0.83%
Clorox Co/The2.21%0.75%
Brown-Forman Corp2.49%0.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in XLP
Masco Corp 2.96%Walmart Inc 10.84%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%Costco Wholesale Corp 9.06%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Procter & Gamble Co/The 7.46%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Coca-Cola Co/The 6.87%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Philip Morris International Inc 6.16%
Datadog Inc 2.44%Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Altria Group Inc 4.55%
Broadcom Inc 2.43%Monster Beverage Corp 4.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MOAT and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckState Street
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%100.0%
Holdings5534

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and XLP returned +6.3%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or XLP?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources