Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs VTV: how they differ

MOAT and VTV hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VTV hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATVTV
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc1.18%0.70%
PepsiCo Inc1.17%0.70%
Walt Disney Co/The1.19%0.63%
Charles Schwab Corp/The2.45%0.57%
Danaher Corp2.41%0.46%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co2.43%0.44%
US Bancorp1.39%0.35%
Mondelez International Inc2.34%0.28%
Northrop Grumman Corp1.15%0.27%
NIKE Inc2.02%0.18%
Blackstone Inc1.28%0.16%
Agilent Technologies Inc1.39%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in VTV
Masco Corp 2.96%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.49%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
Datadog Inc 2.44%Walmart Inc 1.87%
Broadcom Inc 2.43%Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
Veeva Systems Inc 2.41%AbbVie Inc 1.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MOAT and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatUS value
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%98.6%
Holdings55308

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VTV?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources