Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs VONG: how they differ

MOAT and VONG hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and MOAT returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VONG hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATVONG
NVIDIA Corp2.45%13.09%
Broadcom Inc2.43%5.78%
Microsoft Corp2.20%8.98%
Amazon.com Inc1.33%5.07%
Meta Platforms Inc1.17%3.20%
Palo Alto Networks Inc2.51%0.68%
Amphenol Corp1.50%0.55%
Applied Materials Inc2.34%0.31%
Blackstone Inc1.28%0.26%
Fortinet Inc2.21%0.26%
Datadog Inc2.44%0.23%
Airbnb Inc2.56%0.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in VONG
Masco Corp 2.96%Apple Inc 11.97%
Kenvue Inc 2.59%Alphabet Inc 3.91%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.49%Tesla Inc 3.48%
Danaher Corp 2.41%Alphabet Inc 3.15%
Mondelez International Inc 2.34%Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
Constellation Brands Inc 2.32%Visa Inc 1.57%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc 2.30%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.47%
Otis Worldwide Corp 2.24%Costco Wholesale Corp 1.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MOAT and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%95.6%
Holdings55387

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VONG returned +7.2%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VONG?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources