Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs VO: how they differ

MOAT and VO hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and VO returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VO hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATVO
Datadog Inc2.44%0.84%
Motorola Solutions Inc1.24%0.67%
Fortinet Inc2.21%0.46%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc1.42%0.42%
Agilent Technologies Inc1.39%0.36%
Kenvue Inc2.59%0.36%
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc2.21%0.28%
Otis Worldwide Corp2.24%0.27%
Zoetis Inc1.82%0.26%
Fair Isaac Corp2.14%0.26%
Veeva Systems Inc2.41%0.25%
Hershey Co/The1.22%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in VO
Masco Corp 2.96%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.49%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Cummins Inc 0.95%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%
Broadcom Inc 2.43%Constellation Energy Corp 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MOAT and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%91.4%
Holdings55282

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VO returned +12.0%, so VO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VO?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources