Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MOAT vs VGT: how they differ
MOAT and VGT hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VGT hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MOAT | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 2.45% | 16.85% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.43% | 4.21% |
| Microsoft Corp | 2.20% | 9.47% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 2.34% | 1.40% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 2.51% | 0.92% |
| Amphenol Corp | 1.50% | 0.73% |
| Fortinet Inc | 2.21% | 0.42% |
| Datadog Inc | 2.44% | 0.36% |
| Motorola Solutions Inc | 1.24% | 0.30% |
| Fair Isaac Corp | 2.14% | 0.16% |
| Entegris Inc | 1.73% | 0.13% |
| Tyler Technologies Inc | 2.15% | 0.09% |
| Only in MOAT | Only in VGT |
|---|---|
| Masco Corp 2.96% | Apple Inc 14.59% |
| Kenvue Inc 2.59% | Micron Technology Inc 4.21% |
| Airbnb Inc 2.56% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21% |
| Brown-Forman Corp 2.49% | Intel Corp 2.03% |
| Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45% | Cisco Systems Inc 1.85% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43% | Lam Research Corp 1.56% |
| Danaher Corp 2.41% | Oracle Corp 1.46% |
| Veeva Systems Inc 2.41% | Palantir Technologies Inc 1.35% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | VanEck | Vanguard |
| What it is | Morningstar Wide Moat | Information technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | +35.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | +17.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.46% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.6% | 86.9% |
| Holdings | 55 | 317 |
MOAT in plain words
MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VGT in plain words
VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VGT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MOAT or VGT?
- MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MOAT and VGT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 87% of VGT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources