Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs VDC: how they differ

MOAT and VDC hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and MOAT returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VDC hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and VDC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATVDC
Mondelez International Inc2.34%2.69%
Kenvue Inc2.59%1.21%
PepsiCo Inc1.17%4.30%
Hershey Co/The1.22%1.06%
Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The2.14%0.83%
Constellation Brands Inc2.32%0.80%
Clorox Co/The2.21%0.47%
McCormick & Co Inc/MD1.29%0.46%
Brown-Forman Corp2.49%0.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in VDC
Masco Corp 2.96%Walmart Inc 14.76%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%Costco Wholesale Corp 12.04%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Procter & Gamble Co/The 9.27%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Coca-Cola Co/The 8.72%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Philip Morris International Inc 4.66%
Datadog Inc 2.44%Altria Group Inc 3.91%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Colgate-Palmolive Co 2.37%
Broadcom Inc 2.43%Monster Beverage Corp 2.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MOAT and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatConsumer Staples
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+4.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−12.9 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%86.6%
Holdings55103

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VDC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VDC returned +4.6%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VDC?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so VDC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against VDC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources