Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs VB: how they differ

MOAT and VB hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and VB hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATVB
Entegris Inc1.73%0.33%
Masco Corp2.96%0.20%
TransUnion1.16%0.17%
Tyler Technologies Inc2.15%0.15%
Clorox Co/The2.21%0.14%
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc1.17%0.13%
Guidewire Software Inc1.18%0.13%
Domino's Pizza Inc1.15%0.12%
Jack Henry & Associates Inc1.33%0.12%
Tractor Supply Co1.28%0.10%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc2.30%0.10%
Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc2.00%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in VB
Kenvue Inc 2.59%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%Jabil Inc 0.49%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Natera Inc 0.45%
Datadog Inc 2.44%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Twilio Inc 0.38%
Broadcom Inc 2.43%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MOAT and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%21.7%
Holdings551311

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VB?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources