Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MOAT vs SPYG: how they differ
MOAT and SPYG hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and SPYG hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MOAT | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 2.45% | 13.66% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.43% | 5.04% |
| Microsoft Corp | 2.20% | 7.81% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 2.34% | 1.62% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 1.33% | 3.48% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.17% | 3.49% |
| Amphenol Corp | 1.50% | 0.61% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 2.51% | 0.44% |
| Datadog Inc | 2.44% | 0.24% |
| Fortinet Inc | 2.21% | 0.17% |
| Airbnb Inc | 2.56% | 0.08% |
| Veeva Systems Inc | 2.41% | 0.05% |
| Only in MOAT | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| Masco Corp 2.96% | Apple Inc 5.99% |
| Kenvue Inc 2.59% | Alphabet Inc 5.91% |
| Brown-Forman Corp 2.49% | Alphabet Inc 4.71% |
| Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45% | Micron Technology Inc 3.67% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43% | Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% |
| Danaher Corp 2.41% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.67% |
| Mondelez International Inc 2.34% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58% |
| Constellation Brands Inc 2.32% | Tesla Inc 2.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | VanEck | State Street |
| What it is | Morningstar Wide Moat | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.46% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 91.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 55 | 147 |
MOAT in plain words
MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MOAT or SPYG?
- MOAT charges 0.46% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MOAT and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources