Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MOAT vs SCHP: how they differ
MOAT and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MOAT returned more over the year.
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MOAT | Only in SCHP |
|---|---|
| Masco Corp 2.96% | United States Treasury 4.09% |
| Kenvue Inc 2.59% | United States Treasury 4.03% |
| Airbnb Inc 2.56% | United States Treasury 4.02% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51% | United States Treasury 3.79% |
| Brown-Forman Corp 2.49% | United States Treasury 3.62% |
| Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45% | United States Treasury 3.42% |
| NVIDIA Corp 2.45% | United States Treasury 3.39% |
| Datadog Inc 2.44% | United States Treasury 3.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | VanEck | Schwab |
| What it is | Morningstar Wide Moat | US TIPS |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.3% | −0.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.2 pts | −18.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 55 | 48 |
MOAT in plain words
MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHP in plain words
SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or SCHP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MOAT or SCHP?
- MOAT charges 0.46% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against SCHP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-SCHP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources