Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs SCHG: how they differ

MOAT and SCHG hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and SCHG hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATSCHG
NVIDIA Corp2.45%11.02%
Broadcom Inc2.43%4.55%
Microsoft Corp2.20%7.18%
Amazon.com Inc1.33%5.68%
Meta Platforms Inc1.17%3.46%
Palo Alto Networks Inc2.51%0.80%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc1.18%0.65%
Walt Disney Co/The1.19%0.63%
Danaher Corp2.41%0.40%
Fortinet Inc2.21%0.30%
Datadog Inc2.44%0.28%
Airbnb Inc2.56%0.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in SCHG
Masco Corp 2.96%Apple Inc 9.84%
Kenvue Inc 2.59%Alphabet Inc 4.76%
Brown-Forman Corp 2.49%Tesla Inc 3.92%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Alphabet Inc 3.78%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Eli Lilly & Co 3.06%
Applied Materials Inc 2.34%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94%
Mondelez International Inc 2.34%Visa Inc 1.92%
Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc 2.30%Costco Wholesale Corp 1.48%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MOAT and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckSchwab
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%95.4%
Holdings55193

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or SCHG?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources