Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MOAT vs NOBL: how they differ

MOAT and NOBL hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and MOAT returned more over the year.

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MOAT and NOBL hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MOAT and NOBL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMOATNOBL
West Pharmaceutical Services Inc1.70%1.73%
Kenvue Inc2.59%1.47%
Clorox Co/The2.21%1.33%
Brown-Forman Corp2.49%1.31%
McCormick & Co Inc/MD1.29%1.34%
PepsiCo Inc1.17%1.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MOATOnly in NOBL
Masco Corp 2.96%Nucor Corp. 1.77%
Airbnb Inc 2.56%International Business Machines Corp. 1.71%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67%
NVIDIA Corp 2.45%Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62%
Datadog Inc 2.44%Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.43%Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61%
Broadcom Inc 2.43%Hormel Foods Corp. 1.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MOAT and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanEckProShares
What it isMorningstar Wide MoatS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year+11.3%+9.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.2 pts−8.1 pts
Expense ratio0.46%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50091.6%100.0%
Holdings5569

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MOAT or NOBL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MOAT returned +11.3% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MOAT or NOBL?
MOAT charges 0.46% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MOAT and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of MOAT and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MOAT against NOBL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MOAT against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MOAT-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources