Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MGK vs XOVR: how they differ
MGK and XOVR hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and MGK returned more over the year.
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MGK and XOVR hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MGK | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 13.29% | 9.48% |
| Alphabet Inc | 5.93% | 6.53% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 4.08% | 4.47% |
| Tesla Inc | 3.93% | 1.63% |
| Arista Networks Inc | 0.77% | 2.31% |
| AppLovin Corp | 0.65% | 3.95% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 0.97% | 0.56% |
| Only in MGK | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 12.19% | Astera Labs Inc 7.75% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.52% | Natera Inc 3.70% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.67% | Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.47% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.28% | Reddit Inc 2.78% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.41% | Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.20% | Axon Enterprise Inc 2.60% |
| Lam Research Corp 1.93% | Rocket Lab Corp 2.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | ERShares |
| What it is | Mega Cap Growth | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.9% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −2.6 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 99.2% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 56 | 32 |
MGK in plain words
MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MGK or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +14.9% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so MGK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MGK or XOVR?
- MGK charges 0.07% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MGK and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of MGK and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MGK against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MGK-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources