Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MGK vs SPYG: how they differ

MGK and SPYG hold 73% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MGK and SPYG hold 73% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MGK and SPYG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMGKSPYG
NVIDIA Corp13.29%13.66%
Microsoft Corp7.52%7.81%
Apple Inc12.19%5.99%
Alphabet Inc5.93%5.91%
Alphabet Inc4.67%4.71%
Broadcom Inc4.28%5.04%
Meta Platforms Inc4.08%3.49%
Amazon.com Inc4.47%3.48%
Eli Lilly & Co3.41%2.67%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.20%2.67%
Tesla Inc3.93%2.07%
Lam Research Corp1.93%1.53%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MGKOnly in SPYG
Intel Corp 1.10%Micron Technology Inc 3.67%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.60%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58%
Western Digital Corp 0.52%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.51%Caterpillar Inc 1.38%
Equinix Inc 0.50%Johnson & Johnson 1.02%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.48%RTX Corp 0.72%
Synopsys Inc 0.45%Cisco Systems Inc 0.69%
Ecolab Inc 0.42%AbbVie Inc 0.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MGK and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isMega Cap GrowthSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+14.9%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.6 pts+0.4 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50099.2%100.0%
Holdings56147

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MGK or SPYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +14.9% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MGK or SPYG?
MGK charges 0.07% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MGK and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of MGK and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 73% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MGK against SPYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MGK against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MGK-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources