Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MGK vs REMX: how they differ

Over the year REMX returned more, +21.9% against +14.9%, and MGK charges 0.07% against 0.53%.

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MGK and REMX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MGKOnly in REMX
NVIDIA Corp 13.29%Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 7.28%
Apple Inc 12.19%Albemarle Corp 7.24%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Tec 7.06%
Alphabet Inc 5.93%PLS Group Ltd 6.84%
Alphabet Inc 4.67%Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.80%
Amazon.com Inc 4.47%MP Materials Corp 6.20%
Broadcom Inc 4.28%Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 5.94%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.08%Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 4.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MGK and REMX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundThematic ETF
IssuerVanguardVanEck
What it isMega Cap GrowthMiners and metals
Total return, 1 year+14.9%+21.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.6 pts+4.4 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.53%
Already in the S&P 50099.2%7.2%
Holdings5630

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

REMX in plain words

By weight, 7% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.4 pts. It sits 67.6% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MGK or REMX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +14.9% and REMX returned +21.9%, so REMX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MGK or REMX?
MGK charges 0.07% a year and REMX charges 0.53%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MGK and REMX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of MGK and 7% of REMX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are MGK and REMX the same kind of fund?
No. MGK is an index ETF and REMX is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MGK against REMX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MGK against REMX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MGK-REMX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources