Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MGK vs QUAL: how they differ

MGK and QUAL hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MGK and QUAL hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MGK and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMGKQUAL
NVIDIA Corp13.29%6.52%
Apple Inc12.19%6.28%
Microsoft Corp7.52%5.05%
Meta Platforms Inc4.08%3.50%
Eli Lilly & Co3.41%2.92%
Alphabet Inc5.93%2.54%
Alphabet Inc4.67%2.12%
Lam Research Corp1.93%3.23%
Visa Inc1.82%3.09%
KLA Corp1.48%2.79%
Mastercard Inc1.47%2.30%
Applied Materials Inc1.13%2.45%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MGKOnly in QUAL
Amazon.com Inc 4.47%CATERPILLAR INC. 2.52%
Broadcom Inc 4.28%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.12%
Tesla Inc 3.93%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.92%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.20%SLB N.V. 1.56%
Sandisk Corp 1.28%QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.42%
GE Vernova Inc 1.21%COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 1.31%
Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.10%WALMART INC. 1.23%
Intel Corp 1.10%ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION 1.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MGK and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerVanguardiShares
What it isMega Cap GrowthMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+14.9%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.6 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50099.2%98.9%
Holdings56121

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MGK or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +14.9% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MGK or QUAL?
MGK charges 0.07% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so MGK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MGK and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of MGK and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MGK against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MGK against QUAL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MGK-QUAL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources