Which returned more over the last year, MGK or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +14.9% and MUB returned +0.1%, so MGK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MGK or MUB?

MGK charges 0.07% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MGK vs MUB: how they differ

MGK and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MGK returned more over the year.

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MGK and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MGK	Only in MUB
NVIDIA Corp 13.29%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
Apple Inc 12.19%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
Alphabet Inc 5.93%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
Alphabet Inc 4.67%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
Amazon.com Inc 4.47%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
Broadcom Inc 4.28%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.08%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MGK and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MGK Vanguard Mega Cap Growth Index Fund	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Mega Cap Growth	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+14.9%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−2.6 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.07%	0.05%
Holdings	56	6603

MGK in plain words

MGK is an index equity fund tracking the Mega Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 63.8%.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MGK or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGK returned +14.9% and MUB returned +0.1%, so MGK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MGK or MUB?: MGK charges 0.07% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MGK against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MGK against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MGK-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources