Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MDY vs VTWO: how they differ

MDY and VTWO hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and VTWO returned more over the year.

SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MDY and VTWO hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MDY and VTWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMDYVTWO
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC0.71%0.76%
TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC0.54%0.52%
NEXTPOWER INC0.49%0.67%
COEUR MINING INC0.47%0.58%
SITIME CORP0.46%0.47%
DYCOM INDUSTRIES INC0.42%0.44%
SEMTECH CORP0.42%0.42%
RAMBUS INC0.40%0.46%
SANMINA CORP0.37%0.41%
DIGITALOCEAN HOLDINGS INC0.35%0.35%
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES INC0.39%0.34%
ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.32%0.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MDYOnly in VTWO
TWILIO INC 0.86%Bloom Energy Corp 1.83%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.12%
MKS INC 0.83%Fabrinet 0.69%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%IonQ Inc 0.63%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%EchoStar Corp 0.52%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%Guardant Health Inc 0.47%
ATI INC 0.74%Modine Manufacturing Co 0.43%
ILLUMINA INC 0.73%Planet Labs PBC 0.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MDY and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isS&P MidCap 400, book from IJHRussell 2000
Total return, 1 year+13.0%+21.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.5 pts+3.9 pts
Expense ratio0.23%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.5%
Holdings4001951

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTWO in plain words

VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MDY or VTWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MDY returned +13.0% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so VTWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MDY or VTWO?
MDY charges 0.23% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so VTWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MDY and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of MDY and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MDY against VTWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MDY against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MDY-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources