Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MDY vs VT: how they differ

MDY and VT hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and VT returned more over the year.

SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MDY and VT hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MDY and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMDYVT
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP0.77%0.03%
MASTEC INC0.71%0.02%
XPO INC0.67%0.02%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP0.64%0.02%
EVERPURE INC0.69%0.02%
ENTEGRIS INC0.76%0.02%
US FOODS HOLDING CORP0.62%0.02%
WOODWARD INC0.70%0.02%
ATI INC0.74%0.02%
BURLINGTON STORES INC0.55%0.02%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC0.49%0.02%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP0.85%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MDYOnly in VT
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%Apple Inc 3.53%
FABRINET 0.56%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD 0.44%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS PLC 0.42%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD 0.37%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.30%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
CNH INDUSTRIAL NV 0.27%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MDY and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetVanguard
What it isS&P MidCap 400, book from IJHTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+13.0%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.5 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.23%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%55.2%
Holdings40010042

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MDY or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MDY returned +13.0% and VT returned +18.9%, so VT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MDY or VT?
MDY charges 0.23% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MDY and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of MDY and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MDY against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MDY against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MDY-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources