Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MBB vs VEA: how they differ
MBB and VEA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VEA returned more over the year.
iShares MBS ETF and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MBB and VEA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MBB | Only in VEA |
|---|---|
| Freddie Mac 1.07% | ASML Holding NV 2.37% |
| Government National Mortgage Association 0.97% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.56% |
| UMBS, TBA 0.85% | SK hynix Inc 1.40% |
| Government National Mortgage Association 0.69% | HSBC Holdings PLC 1.01% |
| UMBS, TBA 0.66% | Novartis AG 0.91% |
| Government National Mortgage Association 0.56% | Royal Bank of Canada 0.90% |
| Government National Mortgage Association 0.55% | AstraZeneca PLC 0.87% |
| Government National Mortgage Association 0.54% | Nestle SA 0.82% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MBB iShares MBS ETF | VEA Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Mbs | Developed markets ex US |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.1% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.6 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 11144 | 3870 |
MBB in plain words
MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VEA in plain words
VEA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3870 positions, with the top ten at 13.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MBB or VEA?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and VEA returned +24.5%, so VEA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MBB or VEA?
- MBB charges 0.04% a year and VEA charges 0.03%, so VEA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MBB against VEA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MBB-VEA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources