Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MBB vs USO: how they differ

MBB is a bond index fund and USO a commodity fund, and over the year USO returned more, +112.2% against −0.1%.

iShares MBS ETF and United States Oil Fund, LP.

MBB and USO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MBB
iShares MBS ETF
USO
United States Oil Fund, LP
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesUnited
What it isMbsOil
Total return, 1 year−0.1%+112.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.6 pts+94.7 pts
Expense ratio0.04%not published
Holdings11144not filed

MBB in plain words

MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

USO in plain words

USO is a commodity fund tracking the Oil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +112.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 57.1% below its high of Apr 8, 2011 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or USO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and USO returned +112.2%, so USO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MBB against USO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MBB against USO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MBB-USO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources