Which returned more over the last year, MBB or TLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and TLT returned −6.4%, so MBB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MBB or TLT?

MBB charges 0.04% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MBB vs TLT: how they differ

MBB and TLT are both bond index funds, and over the year MBB returned more, −0.1% against −6.4%.

iShares MBS ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

MBB and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MBB iShares MBS ETF	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Mbs	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.04%	0.15%
Holdings	11144	not filed

MBB in plain words

MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or TLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and TLT returned −6.4%, so MBB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MBB or TLT?: MBB charges 0.04% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MBB against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MBB against TLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MBB-TLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources