Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MBB vs SLV: how they differ
MBB is a bond index fund and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against −0.1%.
iShares MBS ETF and iShares Silver Trust.
| MBB iShares MBS ETF | SLV iShares Silver Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Mbs | Silver |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.1% | +53.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.6 pts | +36.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 11144 | not filed |
MBB in plain words
MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SLV in plain words
SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MBB or SLV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MBB or SLV?
- MBB charges 0.04% a year and SLV charges 0.50%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MBB against SLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MBB-SLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources