Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MBB vs SCHB: how they differ

MBB is a bond index fund and SCHB an equity index fund, and over the year SCHB returned more, +17.2% against −0.1%.

iShares MBS ETF and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF.

MBB and SCHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MBB
iShares MBS ETF
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isMbsUS broad market, book from ITOT
Total return, 1 year−0.1%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−17.6 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.04%not published
Holdings11144not filed

MBB in plain words

MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHB in plain words

SCHB is an index equity fund tracking the US broad market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MBB or SCHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MBB returned −0.1% and SCHB returned +17.2%, so SCHB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MBB against SCHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MBB against SCHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MBB-SCHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources