Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs XOVR: how they differ
MAGS and XOVR hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XOVR hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MAGS | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 4.15% | 9.48% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.59% | 4.47% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.89% | 6.53% |
| Tesla Inc | 4.07% | 1.63% |
| Only in MAGS | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | Astera Labs Inc 7.75% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Applovin Corp 3.95% |
| Apple Inc 4.12% | Natera Inc 3.70% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.11% | Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.62% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
| Reddit Inc 2.78% | |
| Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64% | |
| Axon Enterprise Inc 2.60% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | ERShares |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 9 | 32 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or XOVR?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources