Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs XLI: how they differ
MAGS and XLI hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XLI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGS | Only in XLI |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | Caterpillar Inc 8.52% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | General Electric Co 6.77% |
| NVIDIA Corp 4.15% | GE Vernova Inc 5.48% |
| Apple Inc 4.12% | RTX Corp 4.44% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.11% | Boeing Co/The 2.96% |
| Tesla Inc 4.07% | Eaton Corp PLC 2.87% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.62% | Union Pacific Corp 2.81% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% | Deere & Co 2.77% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | XLI State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | State Street |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | Industrials |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +14.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 9 | 81 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
XLI in plain words
XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XLI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and XLI returned +14.3%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or XLI?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources