Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs XLG: how they differ
MAGS and XLG hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XLG hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MAGS | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 4.15% | 13.10% |
| Apple Inc | 4.12% | 10.76% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.11% | 6.99% |
| Microsoft Corp | 3.62% | 8.18% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.59% | 3.61% |
| Tesla Inc | 4.07% | 2.90% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.89% | 6.05% |
| Only in MAGS | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | Broadcom Inc. 4.85% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Alphabet Inc. 4.82% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2.35% | |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. 2.28% | |
| Eli Lilly and Co. 2.00% | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.74% | |
| Walmart Inc. 1.56% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Invesco |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 9 | 51 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and XLG returned +12.2%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or XLG?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources