Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs XLE: how they differ
MAGS and XLE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLE returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGS | Only in XLE |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | Exxon Mobil Corp 22.71% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Chevron Corp 16.12% |
| NVIDIA Corp 4.15% | ConocoPhillips 6.58% |
| Apple Inc 4.12% | Williams Cos Inc/The 5.04% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.11% | Valero Energy Corp 4.65% |
| Tesla Inc 4.07% | Marathon Petroleum Corp 4.49% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.62% | EOG Resources Inc 4.15% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% | SLB Ltd 4.10% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | XLE State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | State Street |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | Energy |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +50.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | +33.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 9 | 21 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
XLE in plain words
XLE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 21 positions, with the top ten at 75.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XLE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and XLE returned +50.7%, so XLE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or XLE?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so XLE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and XLE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 100% of XLE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against XLE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-XLE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources