Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs XLB: how they differ
MAGS and XLB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XLB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGS | Only in XLB |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | Linde PLC 14.08% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Newmont Corp 5.85% |
| NVIDIA Corp 4.15% | Freeport-McMoRan Inc 5.31% |
| Apple Inc 4.12% | Corteva Inc 4.97% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.11% | Sherwin-Williams Co/The 4.95% |
| Tesla Inc 4.07% | Ecolab Inc 4.73% |
| Microsoft Corp 3.62% | Vulcan Materials Co 4.72% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% | CRH PLC 4.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | XLB State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | State Street |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | Materials |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +12.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 9 | 26 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
XLB in plain words
XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XLB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and XLB returned +12.0%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or XLB?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so XLB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against XLB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-XLB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources