Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs XBI: how they differ

MAGS and XBI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and XBI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MAGSOnly in XBI
TREASURY BILL 65.41%Apogee Therapeutics Inc 1.49%
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%Moderna Inc 1.41%
NVIDIA Corp 4.15%Twist Bioscience Corp 1.41%
Apple Inc 4.12%Oruka Therapeutics Inc 1.38%
Amazon.com Inc 4.11%Kymera Therapeutics Inc 1.36%
Tesla Inc 4.07%Viking Therapeutics Inc 1.31%
Microsoft Corp 3.62%Praxis Precision Medicines Inc 1.29%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%Erasca Inc 1.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

MAGS and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
XBI
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerRoundhillState Street
What it isMagnificent SevenSPDR S&P Biotech
Total return, 1 year+14.4%+64.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−3.1 pts+46.5 pts
Expense ratio0.30%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50026.5%8.5%
Holdings9150

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

XBI in plain words

XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or XBI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and XBI returned +64.0%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or XBI?
MAGS charges 0.30% a year and XBI charges 0.35%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MAGS and XBI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 8% of XBI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against XBI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against XBI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-XBI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources