Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs VONG: how they differ
MAGS and VONG hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and VONG hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MAGS | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 4.15% | 13.09% |
| Apple Inc | 4.12% | 11.97% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.11% | 5.07% |
| Microsoft Corp | 3.62% | 8.98% |
| Tesla Inc | 4.07% | 3.48% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.59% | 3.20% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.89% | 3.91% |
| Only in MAGS | Only in VONG |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | Broadcom Inc 5.78% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Alphabet Inc 3.15% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% | |
| Visa Inc 1.57% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.47% | |
| Costco Wholesale Corp 1.28% | |
| Lam Research Corp 1.21% | |
| Mastercard Inc 1.20% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Vanguard |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | Russell 1000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 95.6% |
| Holdings | 9 | 387 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or VONG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and VONG returned +7.2%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or VONG?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources