Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MAGS or VCLT?

MAGS charges 0.30% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs VCLT: how they differ

MAGS and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MAGS	Only in VCLT
TREASURY BILL 65.41%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
NVIDIA Corp 4.15%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
Apple Inc 4.12%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
Amazon.com Inc 4.11%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
Tesla Inc 4.07%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
Microsoft Corp 3.62%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MAGS and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Roundhill	Vanguard
What it is	Magnificent Seven	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+14.4%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−3.1 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.03%
Holdings	9	2775

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or VCLT?: MAGS charges 0.30% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against VCLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-VCLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources