Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or USHY?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and USHY returned +3.3%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MAGS or USHY?

MAGS charges 0.30% a year and USHY charges 0.08%, so USHY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs USHY: how they differ

MAGS and USHY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and USHY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MAGS	Only in USHY
TREASURY BILL 65.41%	1261229 BC LTD 0.48%
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%	ECHOSTAR CORP 0.42%
NVIDIA Corp 4.15%	QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC 0.29%
Apple Inc 4.12%	SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.28%
Amazon.com Inc 4.11%	CLOUD SOFTWARE GRP INC 0.27%
Tesla Inc 4.07%	WULF COMPUTE LLC 0.26%
Microsoft Corp 3.62%	ASURION LLC/ASURION CO 0.26%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%	HUB INTERNATIONAL LTD 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

MAGS and USHY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Roundhill	iShares
What it is	Magnificent Seven	Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+14.4%	+3.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−3.1 pts	−14.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.08%
Holdings	9	1894

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

USHY in plain words

USHY is a bond fund tracking the Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or USHY?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and USHY returned +3.3%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or USHY?: MAGS charges 0.30% a year and USHY charges 0.08%, so USHY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against USHY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against USHY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-USHY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources