Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
MAGS vs SCHG: how they differ
MAGS and SCHG hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and SCHG hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | MAGS | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 4.15% | 11.02% |
| Apple Inc | 4.12% | 9.84% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.11% | 5.68% |
| Tesla Inc | 4.07% | 3.92% |
| Microsoft Corp | 3.62% | 7.18% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 3.59% | 3.46% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.89% | 4.76% |
| Only in MAGS | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 65.41% | Broadcom Inc 4.55% |
| Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% | Alphabet Inc 3.78% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 3.06% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94% | |
| Visa Inc 1.92% | |
| Costco Wholesale Corp 1.48% | |
| Mastercard Inc 1.41% | |
| Netflix Inc 1.27% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Roundhill | Schwab |
| What it is | Magnificent Seven | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −3.1 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 26.5% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 9 | 193 |
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or SCHG?
- MAGS charges 0.30% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do MAGS and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 26% of MAGS and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources