Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and MUB returned +0.1%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MAGS or MUB?

MAGS charges 0.30% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs MUB: how they differ

MAGS and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MAGS	Only in MUB
TREASURY BILL 65.41%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
NVIDIA Corp 4.15%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
Apple Inc 4.12%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
Amazon.com Inc 4.11%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
Tesla Inc 4.07%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
Microsoft Corp 3.62%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MAGS and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Roundhill	iShares
What it is	Magnificent Seven	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+14.4%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−3.1 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.05%
Holdings	9	6603

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and MUB returned +0.1%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or MUB?: MAGS charges 0.30% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources