Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or MBB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and MBB returned −0.1%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, MAGS or MBB?

MAGS charges 0.30% a year and MBB charges 0.04%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

MAGS vs MBB: how they differ

MAGS and MBB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and iShares MBS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in MAGS	Only in MBB
TREASURY BILL 65.41%	Freddie Mac 1.07%
Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%	Government National Mortgage Association 0.97%
NVIDIA Corp 4.15%	UMBS, TBA 0.85%
Apple Inc 4.12%	Government National Mortgage Association 0.69%
Amazon.com Inc 4.11%	UMBS, TBA 0.66%
Tesla Inc 4.07%	Government National Mortgage Association 0.56%
Microsoft Corp 3.62%	Government National Mortgage Association 0.55%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%	Government National Mortgage Association 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

MAGS and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Roundhill	iShares
What it is	Magnificent Seven	Mbs
Total return, 1 year	+14.4%	−0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−3.1 pts	−17.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.30%	0.04%
Holdings	9	11144

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

MBB in plain words

MBB is a bond fund tracking the Mbs. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or MBB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +14.4% and MBB returned −0.1%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, MAGS or MBB?: MAGS charges 0.30% a year and MBB charges 0.04%, so MBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MAGS against MBB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGS against MBB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/MAGS-MBB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources